Workplace Savings 3.0: Consistent Returns vs. Market Volatility

Let me illustrate, using hypotheticals, the case for some of the products and strategies we believe should be integrated into future workplace plan design. We looked at how a $100,000 portfolio would have fared over the decade ending with 2008, had it been invested in either the S&P 500 or in an absolute return strategy that actually hit its target of outpacing Treasury bills by 5% a year. As you know, equities rose and fell, and then rose and fell hard again, leaving a net loss of roughly 13% over this time frame.

In contrast, an absolute return strategy aiming to beat Treasuries by 5% a year might have scored gains of over 63% — hypothetically — had it succeeded in reaching its goal, producing nearly twice the final portfolio returns delivered by the S&P strategy!

Let me stress again that this is a hypothetical example, not an actual fund. But after the experience of the past decade in equities, I would suggest that strategies that have even the possibility of earning positive returns in down markets are going to be in strong demand.

Excerpted from a speech given by Robert L. Reynolds President and CEO Putnam Investments, at the 401KWire.Com Influencers’ Summit 2009: DC-IO Partnership Washington, DC May 6, 2009. The full speech is embedded below.

Retirement Reform Speech